Product Description
Product Parameters
Product type | PLS60 | PLS90 | PLS115 | PLS142 | Reduction rqatio | Number of stage | |
Rated output torque |
N.M | 30 | 75 | 150 | 400 | 3 | 1 |
40 | 100 | 200 | 560 | 4 | |||
50 | 110 | 210 | 700 | 5 | |||
37 | 62 | 148 | 450 | 8 | |||
27 | 45 | 125 | 305 | 10 | |||
77 | 120 | 260 | 910 | 12 | 2 | ||
68 | 110 | 210 | 780 | 15 | |||
77 | 120 | 260 | 910 | 16 | |||
77 | 110 | 260 | 910 | 20 | |||
68 | 110 | 210 | 780 | 25 | |||
77 | 120 | 260 | 910 | 32 | |||
68 | 110 | 210 | 780 | 40 | |||
37 | 62 | 148 | 450 | 64 | |||
27 | 45 | 125 | 305 | 100 | |||
Life | Hour | 30,000 | |||||
Instant stop torque | N.M | Two times of rated output torque | |||||
Product type | PLS60 | PLS90 | PLS115 | PLS142 | Number of stage | ||
max radial torque | 3000 | 3900 | 4300 | 8200 | N | ||
max axial torque | 6000 | 9000 | 12000 | 19000 | N | ||
Fullload efficiency | 98 | % | 1 | ||||
95 | 2 | ||||||
weight | 3.0 | 4.3 | 9.0 | 15.4 | kg | 1 | |
3.8 | 5.7 | 11.6 | 18.5 | 2 | |||
operating temperature | -25ºC~+90ºC | ºC | |||||
IP | lp65 | ||||||
Lubirication type | Lifetime lubrication | ||||||
Mounting type | Any | ||||||
The max radial and axial torque work in the location of the center of output shaft when the out speed is 100RPM. |
Detailed Photos
Application
Company Profile
Certifications
Packaging & Shipping
/* March 10, 2571 17:59:20 */!function(){function s(e,r){var a,o={};try{e&&e.split(“,”).forEach(function(e,t){e&&(a=e.match(/(.*?):(.*)$/))&&1
Hardness: | Hardened Tooth Surface |
---|---|
Installation: | Vertical Type |
Layout: | Coaxial |
Gear Shape: | Planetary |
Step: | Single-Step |
Type: | Gear Reducer |
Samples: |
US$ 100/Piece
1 Piece(Min.Order) | |
---|
Comparison of Helical Gearboxes and Bevel Gearboxes
Helical gearboxes and bevel gearboxes are both widely used for power transmission in various industrial applications. Here’s a comparison of their performance:
- Gear Meshing: Helical gearboxes use helical gears with inclined teeth that gradually engage, resulting in smoother and quieter operation compared to the more abrupt engagement of straight-cut bevel gears.
- Efficiency: Helical gearboxes generally offer higher efficiency due to their helical gear design, which distributes loads evenly across the teeth. Bevel gearboxes can have slightly lower efficiency due to the sliding action of gear teeth during engagement.
- Load Capacity: Helical gearboxes can handle higher loads and torque due to the larger contact area of the gear teeth. Bevel gearboxes are suitable for moderate loads and applications where the direction of power transmission needs to be changed.
- Space Efficiency: Bevel gearboxes are often more compact and suitable for applications where space is limited and a change in direction is required. Helical gearboxes may require more space due to the parallel shaft arrangement.
- Noise and Vibration: Helical gearboxes generate less noise and vibration compared to straight-cut bevel gearboxes. Bevel gearboxes can be noisier, especially at higher speeds.
- Application: Helical gearboxes are commonly used in applications requiring smooth and efficient power transmission, such as conveyors, pumps, and mixers. Bevel gearboxes are preferred for applications where changes in direction are necessary, such as in automotive differentials and printing presses.
Ultimately, the choice between helical and bevel gearboxes depends on the specific requirements of the application, including load capacity, space constraints, efficiency goals, and the need for directional changes in power transmission.
Can Helical Gearboxes Be Retrofitted into Existing Machinery Designs?
Yes, helical gearboxes can often be retrofitted into existing machinery designs, providing an opportunity to upgrade the performance, efficiency, and reliability of older equipment. Here are the key points to consider when retrofitting helical gearboxes:
1. Compatibility: Before proceeding with a retrofit, it’s essential to ensure that the new helical gearbox is compatible with the existing machinery in terms of size, mounting, and shaft connections. Proper measurements and analysis are necessary to avoid any misalignment or fitment issues.
2. Space Considerations: Helical gearboxes may have a different physical profile compared to the original gearboxes. Engineers need to assess the available space in the machinery and confirm that the new gearbox will fit without major modifications.
3. Shaft Alignment: Proper shaft alignment is crucial to ensure smooth and efficient operation. During the retrofit, it’s important to align the new helical gearbox with other components in the system to prevent premature wear, noise, and vibration.
4. Power and Torque Ratings: The power and torque ratings of the helical gearbox should match or exceed the requirements of the machinery. This ensures that the new gearbox can handle the loads and stresses that the machinery may encounter.
5. Performance Improvements: Retrofitting with helical gearboxes can lead to improved efficiency, reduced noise, and smoother operation. These benefits can positively impact the overall performance and lifespan of the machinery.
6. Engineering Expertise: Retrofitting involves careful planning, engineering analysis, and implementation. Working with experienced engineers or gearbox specialists is advisable to ensure a successful retrofit without compromising the integrity of the machinery.
7. Cost-Benefit Analysis: Assessing the costs of the retrofit, including the cost of the new gearbox, installation, downtime, and potential modifications, is essential. Comparing these costs to the anticipated benefits of improved performance and efficiency will help make an informed decision.
8. Maintenance Considerations: Retrofitting may also impact maintenance practices. It’s important to understand any changes in lubrication requirements, inspection intervals, and servicing needs that come with the new gearbox.
Conclusion: Retrofitting helical gearboxes into existing machinery designs can be a cost-effective way to enhance the performance and extend the lifespan of equipment. However, careful planning, engineering analysis, and professional expertise are crucial to ensure a successful retrofit that delivers the desired improvements without causing unforeseen issues.
Noise and Vibration Levels in Helical Gearboxes
Helical gearboxes are known for their relatively low noise and vibration levels compared to some other types of gears. However, there are still certain factors that can influence the noise and vibration levels in helical gear systems:
- Helix Angle: The helix angle of helical gears helps to distribute the load over multiple teeth, reducing impact forces and resulting in smoother meshing. This contributes to lower noise and vibration levels.
- Precision Manufacturing: High-precision manufacturing processes can ensure better gear tooth geometry and minimize irregularities that could lead to noise and vibration.
- Lubrication: Proper lubrication is crucial for reducing friction and damping vibrations between gear teeth. Insufficient or improper lubrication can lead to increased noise levels.
- Alignment: Proper alignment of gears is essential to minimize misalignment-induced noise and vibration. Misalignment can cause uneven tooth contact and lead to increased noise and vibration.
- Load Distribution: Helical gears distribute loads over multiple teeth, which helps in reducing localized stresses and vibrations that could cause noise.
- Material Quality: High-quality materials with good damping properties can help absorb vibrations and reduce noise transmission.
- Operating Conditions: Factors such as operating speed, load, temperature, and gear backlash can influence noise and vibration levels.
Overall, helical gearboxes are designed to provide smoother and quieter operation compared to other gear types. However, the noise and vibration levels can still vary based on design, manufacturing quality, and operational factors. Engineers can optimize gear design and operating conditions to achieve the desired noise and vibration characteristics for specific applications.
editor by CX 2024-02-13